Twittering, and on-leave for a few more weeks.

My regular readers have probably noticed that posting has slowed considerably over the last month. This is due to a number of factors, both professional and personal, that have kept me out of Shanghai, and prevented me from doing the reporting that makes this blog (at its best, I believe) a reported blog. So, for the next few weeks, I’m going to hold off posting until I have something reported to say.

A couple of quick notes before I go.

First. Over the last couple of years I’ve been surprised to notice that, on occasion, posts which garnered very little traffic when they were written, can suddenly, for no obvious reason, begin to draw significant traffic. I’m pleased and flattered to note that this has started to happen (both inside and outside of China) with “The Two Cultures: Recycling Edition,” posted on February 6. As a result, I’ll be writing a longer version of that post, in more formal terms, soon (complete with a response to some of the criticism that’s been pointed at it). Sincere thanks to those who’ve taken an interest in that post, linked to it, and written to me about it.

Second. As of today, I am twittering. Not sure why, yet, but I’m told that everything will become obvious in time. So, even though I won’t be writing any more “philosophy of recycling” posts for a few more weeks, I may very well reveal my preferred Hüsker Dü album.

Finally. Not so long ago, I visited a pet trade fair in southern China where, among other wonders, the organizers staged an exhibition of tattooed fish. I took photos, of course, and I probably should’ve just posted them on the double. Instead, foolishly, I held out for an appropriate occasion. But what occasion goes with a tattooed carp? A blog hiatus, I guess:

dsc01010

” …few exchanged garbage for admission.”

I recently spoke to a friend who works for a five-star hotel in a first-tier Chinese city about the precipitous decline in room bookings since the economic crisis hit. He told me that – despite the drop in business – his chain has no plans to drop its prices for fear of devaluing its brand image, especially for customers who value exclusivity.

This valuable lesson came to mind this morning as I skimmed the last week’s newspapers for stories that I might have missed, and came across this unusual promotion in Shanghai Daily:

THE offer of a free ticket to the plum blossom exhibition at Century Park in exchange for a bag of household rubbish found few takers at the weekend, park officials said yesterday.

“More than 20,000 visitors came to the exhibition on Saturday,” said Sun Jiayi. “But very few exchanged garbage for admission.” The offer holds good until the exhibition ends next month.

Alas, the paper didn’t report as to whether this promotion helped or hindered admission at this year’s festival.

Earth to CCTV: What happened to your sprinklers?

[UPDATE: Really remarkable video of fireworks (apparently) igniting the north tower's roof, here (h/t black and white cat)].

If the CCTV complex’s engineers could figure out how to accomplish the marvel of twisting the main CCTV building upon itself, wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume that they could accomplish the relatively easier task of devising a sprinkler system capable of shutting down a fire started by sparks no bigger than cigarette butts upon the roof? Maybe it’s because I’m not in Beijing, but the proportionality (or lack thereof) of the fire strikes me as totally off. Major international building commissions should not turn out to be as fragile as, well, paper lanterns.

1ek94-bdb7ad10ae05f977981ecf7062b71b6d49908e98

In any case, lots of talk in advance of, and during the Olympics, about the “world class” nature of Beijing’s new buildings, and the materials used to build them. I can’t count the number of times that I was told that the Olympic-era buildings were not only “different” from what’s normally built in Beijing and the rest of China – they were substantially better. And maybe that really is the case. But the fact that this wonder of modern architecture burnt to the ground as a result of a few sparks on the roof is reason enough for this blogger to wonder whether or not the materials used in the building were up to “code” – whatever that might mean in modern Beijing.

Of course, it may very well be the case that something other than fireworks caused the fire. But that’s little comfort for those of us wondering where the sprinklers were, and just why the thing went up so quick.

[Sidenote: What kind of hillbilly continues lighting off fireworks in the shadow of a 40-story tower in flames?] Continue reading

Bird Flu? Needs more research.

Early last week a Hong Kong infectious disease expert announced that – in his opinion – China was suffering an outbreak of bird flu among poultry. This conclusion was based upon two factors: first, eight people had been infected with H5N1 since early December; and second, Hong Kong scientists had detected H5N1 virus in dead birds on Lantau Island, suggesting – to them – that the virus was circulating in Guangdong Province. Continue reading