Comments on: Watch as the NYT mis-characterizes China’s Copenhagen negotiating position.

By: Kev

Kev — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:23:13 +0000

You failed to mention that the New York intepretation places the quotation and Copenhagen ina more sympathetic light than the FT one.

By: bill rich

bill rich — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:20:46 +0000

I am quite sure that China is serious about the 40 to 45%. However, it all depends on how China defines 40 to 45%. I bet it is 5 less whatever China can achieve by the target date.

By: IG

IG — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:47:05 +0000

If a blogger did this the NYT ombudsman would hold it up as an example of why the world needs the NYT and its high journalistic standards. I’d be surprised if they run a correction even.

By: journo friend

journo friend — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:53:32 +0000

Tired reporters make dumb mistakes. Wide awake editors should catch them. Surprised nobody in NYC is checking the hyperlinks. No credit to the NYT.